MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408481037 · doi:10.1093/jee/toae297

The impact of Operation Full Stop, New Orleans, Louisiana on suppressing Formosan subterranean termite (<i>Coptotermes formosanus</i>) colonies: 10 years later

2024· article· en· W4408481037 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carrie Cottone, Mark A. Janowiecki, Nan‐Yao Su, Claudia Riegel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Economic Entomology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlateCoptotermesRhinotermitidaeQuarter (Canadian coin)BiologyToxicologyPopulationEcologyDemographyHorticulturePEST analysisGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Formosan subterranean termite management initiative dubbed "Operation Full Stop", sought to protect structures within New Orleans' historic French Quarter. This program, lasting from 1998 to 2012, was able to decrease the overall population of Formosan subterranean termites in the area but did not eliminate all detectable colonies. Since Operation Full Stop ended in 2012, there has been a significant decrease in the number of alates observed in the French Quarter during reproductive flight season. Pedigree analysis was conducted on alates trapped during major swarm events in 2021. It was determined that an average of 7.25 (SD = 2.95) distinct colonies per glue trap were contributing to these swarm events. A bait-use survey was also conducted in the French Quarter, in which all accessible properties were checked to determine whether termite bait products were still in use within the French Quarter. We determined that approximately half (51.00%) of the structures in the French Quarter still currently have bait products installed around their perimeter. The interception of durable baits by neighboring termite colonies may be the reason why there has not been an increase in alate numbers since Operation Full Stop ended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Economic EntomologySame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207