SUBUTTEC Project: SUBdUcTion triggered Terrestrial Evolution in the Caribbean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subduction zones represent more than half of the total plate boundaries length (38,000 over 64,000km) and cause fast geographic changes by a range of geological processes occurring at local to regional scales such as crustal deformation, volcanism, or dynamic topography. The associated transient changes in land-sea distributions influence the migration, genetic drift, adaptation, speciation, and endemism of the terrestrial biosphere that conquered emerged landmasses. Today, archipelagos located along subduction zones hostone-third of the biodiversity hotspots in the world (Myers et al., 2000). In this context, SUBUTTEC research team aim at combining geological and biological data to unravel the links between the subduction dynamics and terrestrial life in subduction zones based on the case study of the Antilles hotspot. This short and dynamic subduction zone, bounding the east of the Caribbean plate, is ideally circumscribed by two giant continents and two equally giant oceans that provide rather static boundary conditions. To unravel the role of the southern Lesser Antilles in the dynamics of Caribbean biodiversity, we will perform paleogeographic reconstructions over the last 20 Myrs, focused on the unknown role of the southern Lesser Antilles, will be done by integrating tectonics, paleomagnetism, (bio-)stratigraphy and geochronology. We will match these paleogeographic reconstructions with the assemblage distribution and phylogenetic records of extant endemic species, which will allow us to test for alternative scenarios of the temporal dispersion and evolution of life in this highly dynamic hotspot region for both biodiversity and tectonic activity. The implementation of comparative biogeographical methods provides here a powerful tool to reveal natural classification of biogeographic areas i.e. bioregionalization and identification of vicariant events. The joint analysis of the geological and biological records will provide a macro-ecological framework of the biosphere/biodiversity dynamics over subduction zones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".