MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408485215 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-19159

Pathways and impacts of increased Greenland and Arctic freshwater fluxes to the Subpolar North Atlantic

2025· preprint· en· W4408485215 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elodie Duyck, Fraser William Goldsworth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyArcticThe arcticClimatologyGulf StreamEnvironmental scienceGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the coming decades, climate change is expected to lead to increasing freshwater input to the subpolar North Atlantic from Greenland and the Arctic. This could affect the ocean circulation in the region, and potentially the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC).Greenland and Arctic origin waters initially enter the coastal and shelf regions of Greenland and Canada, where they are transported by narrow boundary currents. Observational studies and regional simulations have shown that exchanges between the shelf region and the open ocean are restricted to a few areas. This constrains where, how much, and at which timescales, additional freshwater may affect the interior subpolar North Atlantic.The potential effects of Greenland melt on the AMOC is often tested in climate models via hosing experiments, in which large volumes of freshwater are released across broad areas of the North Atlantic. While most hosing experiments release freshwater uniformly in that region to understand the mechanisms and impacts of an AMOC slowdown, a few targeted freshwater release experiments have also been carried out around Greenland to more realistically assess how Greenland melt might affect the ocean circulation.It is however unclear whether the resolution of these models allows to adequately represent the pathways of the added freshwater. Moreover, the traditional understanding of a direct link between convection in the Subpolar Gyre and the AMOC has been challenged, highlighting the need to also assess the effect of the added freshwater on the circulation and hydrography of the subpolar North Atlantic.Here we use results from hosing experiments carried out in the MPI-ESM coupled climate model as part of the NAHosMIP project (Jackson et al 2023) to examine how the added freshwater circulates in the subpolar North Atlantic and affects the region's circulation and hydrography. We compare the Greenland focused and uniform hosing experiments to investigate how the hosing location affects these results. We then evaluate these findings against observations and results from high-resolution regional simulations to determine whether targeted hosing experiments can indeed help understanding the impact of future increases in freshwater input to the subpolar North Atlantic, identify potential limitations, and how they could be addressed.----Jackson, L. C., Alastrué de Asenjo, E., Bellomo, K., Danabasoglu, G., Haak, H., Hu, A., Jungclaus, J., Lee, W., Meccia, V. L., Saenko, O., Shao, A., and Swingedouw, D.: Understanding AMOC stability: the North Atlantic Hosing Model Intercomparison Project, Geoscientific Model Development, 16, 1975–1995, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1975-2023, 2023.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→