MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408486671 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-17242

Characteristics of ocean mesoscale vortices in the Amerasian Basin from a high resolution pan-Arctic model

2025· preprint· en· W4408486671 on OpenAlexaff
Noémie Planat, Carolina O. Dufour, Camille Lique, Jan Klaus Rieck, Claude Talandier, Bruno Tremblay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoscale meteorologyThe arcticClimatologyArcticVortexOceanographyGeographyMeteorologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observations and numerical models reveal that mesoscale eddies are ubiquitous in the Arctic Ocean. These eddies are thought to play an important role in particular in the transport of heat, salt and nutrients from the shelves to the deep basins, in the modulation of the sea ice cover, and in the dynamical equilibrium of the Beaufort gyre. However, the characteristics of these eddies are poorly documented. Here, an eddy detection and tracking method is applied to the output of a high resolution (1/12°) regional model of the Arctic - North Atlantic over the period 1995-2020 to investigate mesoscale eddies in the Amerasian Basin. Over that period, about 6000 eddies per year and per depth level are found distributed about equally between cyclones and anticyclones. On average, these eddies last 7 days, travel 5 km and have a radius of 12.4 km, with strong regional and temporal disparities that exist within the eddy population studied. Down to 250 m (i.e. the second pycnocline), eddy characteristics show a strong asymmetry between the shelf and the central basin with more numerous and larger eddies that travels longer distances with the mean flow along the shelf break. In the top 70 m, the mean characteristics of detected eddies display a strong seasonality following that of the sea ice cover. Below the first pycnocline at 70 m, the number of eddies shows little seasonality but a transient increase in response to the recent acceleration of the gyre. Deeper, within the Atlantic Waters, eddies are generated everywhere across the basin and present little interannual variability.Finally, this eddy census helps interpret some discrepancies found between previous studies that use different datasets and approaches to examine the eddy field in the Arctic. In particular, our analysis show that the anticyclone dominance within the Beaufort Gyre that arises from the analysis of eddies from the Ice Tethered Profilers is partly due a regional sampling bias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→