MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408486964 · doi:10.22158/rhs.v10n1p99

The Community-based Responses to the Opioid Crisis: Lessons Learned from Vancouver, Canada

2025· article· en· W4408486964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rui Yang, Bin Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in Health Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpioidPolitical sciencePsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Overdose deaths and non-fatal overdoses have increased in recent years across North America, due to the increased potency of fentanyl and its analogues, and the addition of other substances, such as benzodiazepines. Facing with the challenges of the opioid crisis, many North American cities have responded differently. These responses mainly focus on one field, such as medical care, law enforcement, judicature, and social security. Among those cities in North America, the community-based crisis response model in Vancouver is worthy of reference by other cities. According to the ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Vancouver Downtown Eastside in 2019, this paper argues that Vancouver has gradually formed a community-based response model since the establishment of Insite, which is the first supervised injection site in North America. The specific performance is as follows: Crosstown Clinic providing hydromorphone for drug addicts, OPS rescuing the overdose people, and Safe Supply strategy. In addition, according to relevant literature review, we found that responding to the challenges of the COVID-19, Vancouver also made some rewarding attempts to deal with the opioid crisis, such as compassion clubs and capsule fentanyl, all of which are the actions to drive the Safe Supply. And the decriminalization of possession certain amount hard drugs from January 31, 2023 in B.C.is another exemption approved by Canadian Government. In brief, Vancouver's community-based crisis response model promotes Vancouver to collaborate in the fields of activist, medical care, law enforcement, judicature, and social security to jointly participate in the governance of the opioid crisis. This paper argues that the lessons learned from Vancouver are the living representation of community empowerment which is confident, resilient, independent and energetic, which has the capacity to identify problems and design solutions at the local level, and which is inclusive and voluntary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0190.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in Health ScienceSame topicOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentFrench-language works237,207