MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408487064 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-15306

From data to discovery: understanding tropical middle stratospheric ozone variability through causal inference

2025· preprint· en· W4408487064 on OpenAlexaff
Evgenia Galytska, Birgit Haßler, Fernando Iglesias‐Suarez, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Sandip Dhomse, Wuhu Feng, Jakob Runge, Veronika Eyring

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCausal inferenceInferenceClimatologyOzone layerOzoneEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeographyEconometricsComputer scienceGeologyMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ozone (O3) plays a critical role in the atmosphere by absorbing harmful ultraviolet solar radiation and also shaping the thermal structure and dynamics of the stratosphere. Variability in O3 levels is driven by a complex interplay of factors, including long-term climate change, the abundance of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), and non-linear interactions between transport and chemical processes. Changes in tropical stratospheric O3 are particularly intricate due to a strong altitude dependence (WMO, 2022). In the tropical middle stratosphere, a region characterized by strong O3 production and loss, during the early 2000s satellite measurements revealed an unexpected decline in O3. Since then, O3 levels in this region have increased again, but the underlying mechanisms driving such variability remain insufficiently understood, highlighting the need to investigate further the processes driving O3 concentrations.In this study, we show the pivotal role of causal inference in disentangling the complex chemical-dynamical influences on O3 behavior in the narrower region of the tropical (10°S-10°N) middle (10 hPa) stratosphere. Causal inference can add significant value to traditional statistical methods by inferring causal relationships, distinguishing genuine causal links from spurious correlations, and quantifying their strength. The framework integrates qualitative physical knowledge through a causal graph applied to satellite observations and state-of-the-art 3-D chemical-transport model (CTM) TOMCAT simulations. By leveraging causal inference, we provide robust insights into the drivers of O3 fluctuations and showcase the method’s potential for uncovering causal relationships in stratospheric chemistry-dynamics interactions. To validate this approach, we first construct a simplified toy model that reproduces major chemical-dynamical interactions in tropical middle stratospheric O3 that are based on the NOx (=NO + NO2) catalytic ozone destruction cycle and stratospheric dynamics via stratospheric residual velocity w*. Using this toy model, we demonstrate that causal discovery reproduces the connections between w*, nitrous oxide (N2O), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and O3 in the tropical middle stratosphere. This successful application establishes a foundation for extending causal effect estimation to observed and modelled chemical processes, including their time lags. We split the periods 2004-2018 into two subperiods (i.e. 2004-2011 when O3 concentrations declined, and 2012-2018 when O3 concentrations increased in the tropical middle stratosphere) to demonstrate differences in the w*-N2O connection that drives distinct O3 behaviors. Additionally, a process-oriented analysis of different Quasibiennial oscillation (QBO) regimes, combined with bootstrap aggregation, reveals robust patterns in chemical-dynamical interactions. These results highlight the potential of causal inference as a transformative tool for advancing our understanding of stratospheric O3 variability and its response to dynamic forcing.World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022, GAW Report No. 278, 509 pp.; WMO: Geneva, 2022.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→