MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408487170 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu25-16250

Time-Lapse Tomography of a Groundwater Pumping Experiment

2025· preprint· en· W4408487170 on OpenAlexaff
Richard S. Kramer, Lu Yang, Clément Estève, Jeremy M. Gosselin, Birgit Jochum, Götz Bokelmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterTomographyEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change significantly impacts groundwater resources by altering recharge rates and thus availability, making it crucial to manage these vital reserves sustainably to ensure long-term water security. In this study we seismically monitor a series of groundwater pumping tests in the municipality of Nickelsdorf (Burgenland, Austria).  Due to expected increasing demand for water due to population development, wells were installed to ensure a sustainable drinking water supply in the long term. Traditionally monitored through point-wise hydrological wells, our approach combines nodal seismic sensors and ambient noise to broaden insights into subsurface processes affected by pumping activity. Seismic ambient noise was continuously recorded over three months in early 2023, including periods before, during, and after pumping. Our study evaluates various ambient noise sources and seismic signals, especially those generated by passing trains. To gain broader understanding of the subsurface processes we perform a time-lapse tomography to identify the location and strength of the velocity variations. Based on our analysis, we resolve increases/decreases in seismic velocity of around 10 % in the uppermost meters of the subsurface during pumping operations related to local reduction in the water table. This holistic approach aims at unveiling the behavior of the subsurface during and post-pumping, potentially offering a comprehensive understanding beyond individual hydrological wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.891

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlow Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207