MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408490911 · doi:10.1002/ajp.70004

Exploring the Utility of the Gut Microbiome as a Longitudinal Health Monitoring Tool in Sanctuary Chimpanzees (<i>Pan troglodytes</i>)

2025· article· en· W4408490911 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Katherine R. Amato, Benjamin R. Lake, Samuel Ozminkowski, Hongmei Jiang, Madelyn Moy, Maria Luisa Savo Sardaro, Amy Fultz, Lydia M. Hopper

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Primatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsMicrobiomeBiologyTroglodytesGut microbiomeLongitudinal studyPrimateExposomeEcologyBioinformaticsMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary goal of captive primate management is to ensure optimal health and welfare of the animals in our care. Given that the gut microbiome interacts closely with host metabolism, immunity, and even cognition, it represents a potentially powerful tool for identifying subtle changes in health status across a range of body systems simultaneously. However, thus far, it has not been widely tested or implemented as a monitoring tool. In this study, we used longitudinal microbiome sampling of newly arrived chimpanzees at Chimp Haven to explore the feasibility of using the gut microbiome as a health and welfare biomarker in a sanctuary environment. We also tested the hypothesis that a transition to a new living environment, and integration into new social groupings, would result in temporal changes in chimpanzee gut microbiome composition. The collection of longitudinal microbiome data at Chimp Haven was feasible, and it revealed temporal shifts that were unique to each individual and, in some cases, correlated to other known impacts on health and behavior. We found limited evidence for microbial change over time after arrival at Chimp Haven that was consistent across individuals. In contrast, social group and enclosure, and to a lesser extent, age and sex, were associated with differences in gut microbiome composition. Microbiome composition was also associated with overall health status categories. However, many of the effects we detected were most apparent when using longitudinal data, as opposed to single time point samples. Additionally, we found important effects of technical factors, specifically outdoor temperature and time to collection, on our data. Overall, we demonstrate that the gut microbiome has the potential to be effectively deployed as a tool for health and environmental monitoring in a population of sanctuary chimpanzees, but the design must be carefully considered. We encourage other institutions to apply these approaches and integrate health and physiology data to build on the utility of gut microbiome analysis for ensuring the welfare of captive primates in a range of contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of PrimatologySame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207