Bimekizumab Maintenance of Response at Every Visit Over 4 Years in Patients with Psoriasis Achieving Clear Skin at Week 16: Results from Four Phase 3 Trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Achieving and maintaining skin clearance is key for patients with psoriasis.1,2 However, loss of disease control over time is often seen with biologics; therefore, evaluating whether high efficacy levels are maintained at every visit in the long term is important.3 Here, we assess whether bimekizumab (BKZ)-treated patients, who achieved complete skin clearance (PASI 100; 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) after 16 weeks, maintained BSA (body surface area) ≤1% and PASI 90/75 (≥90/75% improvement in PASI) responses at every visit over 4 years. Procedure/study: Data were pooled from the 52/56-week BE VIVID/BE SURE/BE READY trials and their 144-week open-label extension (OLE) BE BRIGHT.4–7 Included patients received BKZ 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) to Week16, then Q4W or Q8W into the OLE; all received BKZ Q8W from Week100/104 or next scheduled visit. Dose groups were pooled for all analyses. Proportions of patients achieving PASI 100 at Week16 who maintained BSA ≤1%/PASI 90/PASI 75 at every subsequent study visit (29/30 further visits [study-dependent]) up to Year4 (Week196/200) are reported. Proportions who maintained their response at every visit except at most 1 and at most 2 are also reported. Patients discontinuing treatment due to lack of efficacy/treatment-related adverse events were considered non-responders at subsequent timepoints; last observation carried forward was used for other missing data (mNRI-LOCF). Results: Of 989 BKZ-randomized patients, 62.7% achieved PASI 100 at Week16 (non-responder imputation). 503 Week16 PASI 100 responders received continuous BKZ and entered the OLE. Among these patients, BSA ≤1%, PASI 90, and PASI 75 responses were maintained at every study visit from Week16–Year4 by 69.4%, 80.9%, and 93.0% of patients, respectively (at every visit except at most 1: 79.5%, 87.5%, and 95.2%; at every visit except at most 2: 84.1%, 91.8%, and 96.8%). Conclusion: High proportions of Week16 PASI 100 responders maintained BSA ≤1%/PASI 90/PASI 75 at every visit through 4 years. The vast majority maintained these responses at every visit except at most 2 visits through 4 years. Funding: UCB. Medical writing support: Costello Medical.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".