COPD Exacerbations, Air Pollutant Fluctuations, and Individual-Level Factors in the Pandemic Era
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Pandemic-era associations between air pollutant exposures and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are under-explored. Given the considerable observed pandemic-era pollutant fluctuations, these associations were investigated along with possible individual-level risk factors. Patients and Methods: Participants with spirometry-confirmed COPD from Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) were included, with data collected before (“pre-pandemic”) and during (“pandemic”) the COVID-19 pandemic. Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), ground-level ozone (O 3 ), total oxidant (O x ) and weather data were obtained from national databases. Associations between each air pollutant and “symptom-based” exacerbations (increased dyspnea or sputum volume/purulence ≥ 48hrs) and “event-based” exacerbations (“symptom-based” plus requiring antibiotics, corticosteroids, or unscheduled healthcare use) were estimated in separate models. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were reported as rate ratios (RRs) per interquartile range (IQR) increment in pollutant concentration with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: NO 2 , PM 2.5 , and O x (NO 2 +O 3 ) concentrations (but not O 3 ) fell significantly during the pandemic. In the 673 participants with COPD included, both symptom-based and event-based exacerbation rates were likewise significantly higher during the pre-pandemic period. During the pre-pandemic period, O x was positively associated with symptom-based exacerbations (RR: 1.21 [1.08,1.36]). During the pandemic period, O x was positively associated with symptom-based (1.46 [1.13,1.89]) and event-based (1.43 [1.00,2.05]) exacerbations. Fewer self-reported pandemic protective behaviors, and higher viral infectious symptoms, were also associated with exacerbations. In stepwise multivariable risk-factor analyses, female gender (1.23 [1.04,1.45] and 1.41 [1.13,1.76]) and co-morbid asthma (1.65 [1.34,2.03] and 1.54 [1.19,2.00]) were associated with symptom-based and event-based exacerbations, respectively, blood eosinophils (1.42 [1.10,1.84]) were associated with event-based exacerbations, and each IQR increment in O x was associated with symptom-based exacerbations (1.31 [1.06,1.61]). Conclusion: O x exposure was consistently associated with symptom-based COPD exacerbations, and female gender, co-morbid asthma, and blood eosinophilia were found to be relevant risk factors. Plain Language Summary: Previous research has identified air pollution as a relevant non-infectious trigger for episodic ‘lung attacks’, referred to as exacerbations, in patients living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Very few studies, however, have studied this relationship during the COVID-19 pandemic. During that time, there were large fluctuations in key forms of air pollution (air pollutants). The few studies available used population-level approaches and relied on hospital administrative coding of visits to classify the disease and to identify exacerbation events. This approach may lead to potentially missing clinically important non-severe events and may limit individual-level risk factor assessment around this period. This study was conducted in participants with COPD as confirmed by the gold-standard test, spirometry, who were living in 9 Canadian cities across 6 provinces. The results showed that while the air pollutants nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ), and total oxidant (O x ) concentrations were all notably higher before the pandemic (pre-pandemic), only ambient O x concentration was consistently associated with exacerbations. This relationship was seen across both pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Female gender, co-morbid asthma, and eosinophilia were identified as notable risk factors for exacerbations and were effect modifiers for the association between O x exposure and exacerbations. This study adds to a very limited existing literature on the relationship between air pollutant fluctuations and exacerbations of COPD around the pandemic era and highlights important risk factors to guide targeted public health and exposure response interventions. Keywords: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ambient air pollution, COVID-19 pandemic, total oxidant concentration
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".