MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408500012 · doi:10.1049/mia2.70004

A Broadband LTCC‐Based Cavity‐Backed Patch Phased Array Antenna for Ka‐Band Applications

2025· article· en· W4408500012 on OpenAlexafffund
Mehdi Sadeghi, Mohammad S. Sharawi, Dawood Shekari Beyragh, Ammar B. Kouki, Mohamed Helaoui, Noureddine Outaleb, Wenhua Chen, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPolytechnique Montréal
KeywordsKa bandPhased arrayBroadbandMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaAntenna (radio)OpticsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This paper presents a 4 4 millimeter‐wave (mm‐wave) phased array antenna operating in the Ka‐band (27–34 GHz) fabricated using low‐temperature co‐fired ceramic (LTCC) technology. The proposed array employs several innovative design features to achieve superior performance. An oversized aperture, combined with a parasitic patch and an embedded air cavity, significantly enhances the gain and bandwidth. Additionally, an asymmetric stripline feed structure minimises back radiation and facilitates multi‐layer integration, enabling seamless compatibility with beamforming systems. The antenna demonstrates a measured impedance bandwidth of 27% and a realised gain of 17.5 dBi at 29 GHz, with a scanning angle of . These results establish the design as a compact, high‐efficiency, and broadband solution for mm‐wave phased array applications in 5G and beyond. Experimental validation using a 16‐channel beamformer module further highlights the practicality of the design for real‐world deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Microwaves Antennas & PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207