MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408507350 · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000001050

Early Resumption of Physical Activity and Cognitive Outcomes at 4 Weeks Following Pediatric Concussion

2025· article· en· W4408507350 on OpenAlexaffabout
Veronik Sicard, Roger Zemek, Vid Bijelić, Keith Owen Yeates, Miriam H. Beauchamp, Brian L. Brooks, Peter Anderson, Michelle Keightley, Naddley Désiré, Andrée‐Anne Ledoux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionRivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaireNeuropsychologyMedicineCognitionPhysical therapyPoison controlPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInjury preventionPsychologyPsychiatryMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Early physical activity (PA) after concussion may aid in symptom recovery, though its impact on other recovery domains, such as cognitive functioning, remains less explored. OBJECTIVES: (1) Examine the association between early PA (within 7 days post-injury) and cognitive inefficiency and impairment 4 weeks after pediatric concussion; (2) investigate the association between early PA and cognitive outcomes (memory and executive functioning, information processing speed, attention, visual-motor processing, and vocabulary) 4-week post-concussion. SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) of four Canadian pediatric hospitals within the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) Network. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 8-18 years presenting to the ED within 48 hours of a head injury and diagnosed with a concussion. DESIGN: Planned secondary analysis of data from a prospective multicenter cohort study. MAIN MEASURES: Participants' PA level was assessed at 1-week post-concussion through a self-report questionnaire in which they had to indicate their current level of recovery in terms of return to physical activities and sports. Early PA participation was defined as any level of PA other than "no activity" at the 1-week follow-up. Participants underwent comprehensive neuropsychological testing at 4-week post-concussion. Primary outcome measures included cognitive inefficiency and impairment (≥2 outcomes with z < -1.0 SD or <-1.5 SD below the normative mean, respectively). Secondary and tertiary outcome measures include t-scores and scaled scores from the 10 neuropsychological tasks, transformed to z-scores. RESULTS: Early PA was not significantly associated with the likelihood of cognitive inefficiency or impairment ( P s ≥ .38). The early PA*sex interaction was related to verbal cognitive flexibility ( P = .02), with females engaging in early PA having better scores. Moreover, the early PA*age interaction was associated with attention ( P = .03), with younger children engaged in early PA performing worse. CONCLUSIONS: Early PA has no overall association with cognitive inefficiency or impairment but may be differentially associated with certain cognitive outcomes by age and sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Head Trauma RehabilitationSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207