Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is my privilege and distinct honour to present to you the 20th issue of the Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development, or JAED.The first issue was published in 1997, 20 years ago, and it has been a wonderful and meaningful journey for all involved to this point in time.Huy tseep q'u Siiem nu Siye'yu ("Thank you respected friends and colleagues" in Hul'q'umi'num').The Journal, co-published by the Council for the Advancement of Native Development Officers (Cando) and Captus Press, links practitioners, leaders, community change-agents, and researchers not only to each other, but also to those who coordinate, manage, lead, participate in, and teach about the governance and leadership of Indigenous community, business, entrepreneurial, and economic development.This issue, like the 19 issues that came before, highlights and profiles the ground-breaking economic development work that has been taking place in Indigenous communities locally, nationally, and internationally.As I read through previous issues, I continue to be intrigued by the meaningful coverage of the range and diversity of topics.I invite readers of this issue to do the same and to engage with previous issues, as if for the first time.Each story, each leadership or student profile, each coverage of promising practices, and each topic researched, is as relevant and meaningful today as they were 20 years ago.The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada's "Calls to Action", in addition to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, a document "that describes both individual and collective rights of Indigenous peoples around the world", including economic and development rights, further affirms the need for our continuing effort to promote Aboriginal economic development and self-governance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".