MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408523240 · doi:10.46427/gold2024.24527

A long-lasting tenuous Ediacaran geodynamo: potential linkages with the evolution of animal life

2024· article· en· W4408523240 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. A. Tarduno, Wentao Huang, Shuhai Xiao, Eric G. Blackman, Mauricio Ibáñez-Mejía, Tinghong Zhou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamo theoryAnimal lifeAstrobiologyGeologyEvolutionary biologyBiologyPhysicsDynamoMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paleointensity studies define a geodynamo on the verge of collapse [1,2,3], 10 to 30 times weaker than present-day, when macroscopic animals of the Ediacaran Fauna diversified.New single crystal paleointensity results from ca. 590 Ma dikes of Canada yield field strength of hundreds of nanoteslas (or less) suggesting that the dynamo may have ceased entirely for periods lasting 2 to 100 kyr during the Ediacaran.For times when the field was present, use of solar wind evolution models based on solar analogs [4] suggests steady-state magnetopause standoff distances <4.5 Earth radii (re) at 565 Ma and <4.2re at 591 Ma, compared to the present-day value of 10.7re.During extreme coronal mass ejection events, these distances could have been as low as 1.6re.Decreased standoff distances can lead to enhanced hydrogen escape because the polar cap area of open field lines expands, and this is where non-thermal H+ loss occurs.Estimates of these losses to space suggest they could result in a few percent change of atmospheric oxygen (PAL).This might represent a perturbation or crossing of a threshold, allowing Ediacaran animal diversification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207