MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408541261 · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122592

Numerical response of Trypodendron lineatum to hemlock looper defoliation in boreal balsam fir forest

2025· article· en· W4408541261 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jean‐Michel Béland, Éric Bauce, Conrad Cloutier, Richard Berthiaume, Christian Hébert

Bibliographic record

VenueForest Ecology and Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre de Géomatique du QuébecNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
FundersCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité Laval
KeywordsBalsamAbies lasiocarpaTaigaWestern HemlockAbies balsameaDouglas firBorealChoristoneura fumiferanaBiologyForestryEnvironmental scienceBotanyEcologyPEST analysisSpruce budwormGeographyTortricidaePinus contorta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hemlock looper is one of the most damaging insect defoliators in Canada, often killing trees after only one or two years of heavy defoliation. A study on the short-term succession of saproxylic beetles after a hemlock looper outbreak highlighted the dominance of the striped ambrosia beetle in boreal balsam fir stands heavily defoliated by this looper. In the present study, we measured the numerical response of this ambrosia beetle to balsam fir defoliation. Our objectives were to determine 1) the defoliation threshold triggering massive colonization of balsam fir trees by the striped ambrosia beetle, using emergence traps placed around tree trunks and 2) if the upcoming colonization could be forecasted with multidirectional flight-interception traps or trunk-window traps. Results showed that colonization only began when balsam fir trees reached 95 % defoliation. Trees reaching this threshold had 54 % probability of being massively colonized as indicated by the emergence of hundreds of beetles from single trees over the summer. The probability of massive colonization reached 61 % when defoliation was total. Both, the trunk-window trap and the multidirectional flight-interception trap, proved reliable in predicting striped ambrosia beetle attacks. Either trap captured this beetle in all plots where at least one tree had been massively colonized. These traps could thus be helpful for monitoring populations of the striped ambrosia beetle, predicting tree colonization and planning salvage logging plans. • Hemlock looper feeding on balsam firs does not trigger immediate secondary attacks. • Fully defoliated firs during the first summer will be avoided by secondary beetles. • 2 years after heavy defoliation, only Trypodendron lineatum colonizes fir boles. • Interception traps are efficient to monitor T. lineatum signs of colonization. • 95 % defoliation threshold and traps may help managers optimizing salvage logging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForest Ecology and ManagementSame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207