MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408542776 · doi:10.5430/jha.v14n1p1

Reimagining how we develop leaders for healthcare’s evolving digital/data ecosystem: Implications for graduate programs in health administration

2025· article· en· W4408542776 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dae Hyun Kim, Christy Harris Lemak, Suzanne Austin Boren

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hospital Administration · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdministration (probate law)Health careMedicineKnowledge managementBusinessPublic relationsEnvironmental resource managementPolitical scienceComputer scienceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The evolving healthcare landscape, driven by digital transformation and increasing reliance on emerging Artificial Intelligence-derived tools, calls for a reassessment of the competencies required for effective healthcare leadership. Traditional healthcare administration and informatics programs may no longer meet the current and future complexity of the contemporary healthcare system. This study examines how graduate healthcare administration programs could adapt to better equip future leaders with leadership, management, and technical skills.Methods: The research draws on three sources of information that were analyzed by the authors: (1) a comparison of the National Center for Health Leadership Competency Model 3.0TM and the American Medical Informatics Association Health Informatics Core Competencies; (2) analyses of opportunities to integrate health informatics in general and artificial intelligence (AI), in particular - into healthcare administration education competencies; and (3) insights from interviews with 55 C suite executives from 33 U.S. nonprofit health systems.Results: There are areas for integrating and synthesizing competencies from health care and informatics disciplines. In addition, AI may be integrated across a variety of competencies and learning activities. Future executives will require the ability to integrate technology and informatics knowledge and skills into management and leadership competencies, skills, and behaviors.Conclusions: To prepare healthcare leaders for the digital age, educational programs must integrate informatics and AI-driven technologies into their curricula. This includes a focus on data analytics, financial training, regulatory knowledge, and change management. The study calls for a reimagined approach to healthcare education that ensures leaders are equipped to thrive in an increasingly data-driven and regulated environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.238
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hospital AdministrationSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207