MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408556942 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/adc234

Radiation damage and recovery of plastic scintillators under ultra-high dose rate 200 MeV electrons at CERN CLEAR facility

2025· article· en· W4408556942 on OpenAlexafffund
Cloé Giguère, Alexander Hart, Joseph Bateman, Pierre Korysko, Wilfrid Farabolini, Yoan LeChasseur, Magdalena Bazalova‐Carter, Luc Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsQuébec Metro High Tech Park (Canada)University of VictoriaUniversité LavalHôtel-Dieu de Québec
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsScintillatorDosimeterMaterials scienceDosimetryNuclear medicineAbsorbed doseFlash (photography)Large Hadron ColliderRadiationOpticsPhysicsNuclear physicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. The FLASH effect holds significant potential in improving radiotherapy treatment outcomes. Very high energy electrons (VHEEs) with energies in the range of 50–250 MeV can effectively target tumors deep in the body and can be accelerated to achieve ultra-high dose rates (UHDR), making them a promising modality for delivering FLASH radiotherapy in the clinic. However, apart from suitable VHEE sources, clinical translation requires accurate dosimetry, which is challenging due to the limitation of standard dosimeters under UHDR conditions. In this study, water-equivalent and real-time plastic scintillation dosimeters (PSDs) are tested to evaluate their viability for FLASH VHEE dosimetry. Approach. A 4-channel PSD, consisting of polystyrene-based BCF12 and Medscint proprietary scintillators, polyvinyltoluene-based EJ-212 and a blank plastic fiber channel for Cherenkov subtraction was exposed to the 200 MeV VHEE UHDR beam at the CLEAR CERN facility. The Hyperscint RP200 platform was used to assess linearity to dose pulses of up to 90 Gy and dose rates up to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>4.6</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mn>9</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> Gy s −1 , and to investigate radiation damage and recovery after dose accumulation of 37.2 kGy. Main results. While blank fiber response was linear across the entire dose range studied, light output saturated above 45 Gy/pulse for scintillators. Despite radiation damage, linearity was preserved, though it resulted in a decrease of scintillator and blank fiber light output of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 1.87%/kGy and a shift in spectra towards longer wavelengths. Short-term recovery ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 100 h) of these changes was observed and depended on rest duration and accumulated dose. After long-term rest ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 172 days), light output recovery was partial, with 6%–22% of residual permanent damage remaining, while spectral recovery was complete. Significance. We showed that PSDs are sensitive to radiation damage, but maintain dose linearity even after a total accumulated dose of 37.2 kGy, and exhibit significant response recovery. This work highlights the potential of PSDs for dosimetry in UHDR conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207