MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408567665 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.02.033

Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab Subcutaneous Induction and Maintenance in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease: Results From the Phase 3 GRAVITI Study

2025· article· en· W4408567665 on OpenAlexaff
Ailsa Hart, Remo Panaccione, Flávio Steinwurz, Silvio Danese, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Qian Cao, Timothy E. Ritter, Ursula Seidler, Mobolaji Olurinde, Marion Vetter, Jacqueline Yee, Zijiang Yang, Yuhua Wang, Jewel Johanns, Chenglong Han, Aparna Sahoo, Natalie A. Terry, Bruce E. Sands, Geert D’Haens

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersGenentechMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma CorporationCelltrionKisseiMylanBoston Scientific CorporationTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesEA Pharma Co., Ltd.Gilead SciencesSanofiGlaxoSmithKlineAmgenKyorin PharmaceuticalPfizerCelgeneBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyAstraZenecaJohnson and JohnsonTakeda Pharmaceutical Company
KeywordsCrohn's diseaseMedicineDiseasePhase (matter)Internal medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Subcutaneous (SC) induction and maintenance with guselkumab was evaluated in adult participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. METHODS: The Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, treat-through GRAVITI study randomized 347 participants 1:1:1 to guselkumab 400 mg SC every 4 weeks→100 mg SC every 8 weeks (n = 115), guselkumab 400 mg SC every 4 weeks→200 mg SC every 4 weeks (n = 115), or placebo (n = 117). Placebo participants meeting rescue criteria received guselkumab from week 16 onward. Co-primary endpoints were clinical remission at week 12 and endoscopic response at week 12. Additional multiplicity-controlled endpoints were Patient-Reported Outcome-2 remission (week 12), clinical response (week 12), clinical remission (week 24), clinical remission (week 48), and endoscopic response (week 48). Safety was assessed through week 48. RESULTS: All multiplicity-controlled endpoints were met. At week 12, significantly greater proportions of participants receiving guselkumab 400 mg achieved clinical remission vs placebo (56.1% vs 21.4%; Δ = 34.9; P < .001), and endoscopic response vs placebo (41.3% vs 21.4%; Δ = 19.9; P < .001). At week 48, significantly greater proportions of participants in both guselkumab groups (100 mg SC every 8 weeks: 60.0%, Δ = 42.8; 200 mg SC every 4 weeks: 66.1%, Δ = 48.9) achieved clinical remission vs placebo (17.1%; P < .001 each) and endoscopic response (44.3%, Δ = 37.5; 51.3%, Δ = 44.6; vs placebo 6.8%; P < .001 each). Efficacy was observed in both bionaive participants and those with inadequate response or intolerance to biologics. Adverse event rates were not greater in guselkumab groups vs placebo. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous guselkumab for both induction and maintenance was efficacious in treating participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Safety findings were consistent with those of guselkumab in approved indications, including ulcerative colitis. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT05197049.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207