Perioperative Management With Efanesoctocog Alfa in Patients With Haemophilia A in the Phase 3 XTEND‐1 and XTEND‐Kids Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Phase 3 studies, XTEND-1 (NCT04161495) and XTEND-Kids (NCT04759131), showed once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa provided high-sustained factor VIII (FVIII) activity levels that translated into highly effective bleed prevention in patients with severe haemophilia A. AIM: This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of efanesoctocog alfa for perioperative management during XTEND-1 and XTEND-Kids. METHODS: Patients undergoing major or minor surgery were to receive a single preoperative 50 IU/kg dose, with additional 30 or 50 IU/kg doses every 2-3 days as needed following major surgery. Outcomes assessed included FVIII activity levels, number and dose of efanesoctocog alfa injections, surgeon's/investigator's assessment of haemostatic response, total factor consumption, estimated blood loss, number and type of blood transfusions, and safety. RESULTS: In XTEND-1, 11 adults/adolescents underwent 12 evaluable major surgeries (6 orthopaedic). Eleven surgeries had one preoperative dose (median [range]: 49.9 [13-52] IU/kg); one had no preoperative dose. Median (range) total consumption from Day -1 to 14 was 163.3 (45-361) IU/kg. In XTEND-Kids, two children underwent major surgery with a single preoperative loading dose (60.4 and 61.9 IU/kg). Across trials, 15 adults/adolescents underwent 18 minor surgeries and 8 children underwent 9 minor surgeries, with a single preoperative dose or no preoperative dose (5 surgeries in adults/adolescents). Haemostatic response was rated excellent for all surgeries. No surgeries required blood transfusion. No safety concerns or inhibitor development was reported. CONCLUSION: Efanesoctocog alfa provided highly effective perioperative protection in patients with severe haemophilia A. TRIAL REGISTRATION: XTEND-1: NCT04161495 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04161495; XTEND-Kids: NCT04759131 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04759131.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".