MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408577683 · doi:10.31612/2616-4868.1.2025.14

ENDOSCOPIC THIRD VENTRICULOSTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF NORMOTENSIVE HYDROCEPHALUS. A CLINICAL CASE

2025· article· en· W4408577683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Orest I. Palamar, Andriy Huk, Bohdan O. Davydenko, Oleksandr I. Troian, Kateryna M. Molotkovets

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Preventive Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoscopic third ventriculostomyHydrocephalusMedicineObstructive hydrocephalusVentriculostomySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Normotensive hydrocephalus is an abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid in the ventricles of the brain. This causes an increase in the enlargement of the ventricles and an increase in intracranial pressure. Finally, this will cause gait impairment, decreased cognitive function, and urinary incontinence. Normal pressure hydrocephalus is a potentially clinically reversible disease. For this purpose, ventriculoperitoneal shunt is used. However, ventriculoperitoneal shunting has a high rate of complications. An alternative to ventriculoperitoneal shunting is endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Aim. To determine the possibility and evaluate the results of treatment of normotensive hydrocephalus using endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Materials and methods. At the preoperative stage, the patient underwent the following: a review of complaints and medical history, a neurological examination, a Tap test or lumbar puncture test with a large volume, and an MRI of the brain with intravenous contrast. In the postoperative period, a control MRI of the brain was performed with intravenous enhancement using the CSF Drive mode. The level of cognitive-amnestic disorders was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Scale at both the pre- and postoperative stages. Results. Based on the clinical and anamnestic data, as well as the results of neuroimaging and instrumental diagnostic methods, the patient was diagnosed with normotensive hydrocephalus. The operation performed was an endoscopic third ventriculostomy using an endoscopic, frontal, transcortical approach on the right. In the early postoperative period, the patient experienced partial regression of preoperative symptoms, with gradual complete regression occurring 4 years after the operation. Conclusions. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy can be used in the treatment of normotensive hydrocephalus because it leads to complete regression of symptoms and can be offered as an alternative to ventriculoperitoneal shunting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Preventive MedicineSame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207