MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408586797 · doi:10.1093/protein/gzaf003

Tuning ProteinMPNN to reduce protein visibility via MHC Class I through direct preference optimization

2025· article· en· W4408586797 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProtein Engineering Design and Selection · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsCanadian Asian Studies AssociationUniversity of Victoria
FundersInfrastruktura PL-GridFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejEuropean CommissionRoyal Academy of EngineeringEuropean Regional Development FundHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeUK Research and InnovationIntelligence Community Postdoctoral Research Fellowship ProgramIsrael Cancer Research Fund
KeywordsMHC class IComputer scienceVisibilityMajor histocompatibility complexEpitopeWorkflowComputational biologyImmune systemAntigenBiologyGeneticsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ProteinMPNN is widely used in protein design workflows due to its ability to identify amino acid sequences that fold into specific 3D protein structures. In our work, we adjust ProteinMPNN to design proteins for a given 3D protein structure with reduced immune-visibility to cytotoxic T lymphocytes that recognize proteins via the MHC-I pathway. To achieve this, we developed a novel framework that integrates direct preference optimization (DPO)-a tuning method originally designed for large language models-with MHC-I peptide presentation predictions. This approach fosters the generation of designs with fewer MHC-I epitopes while preserving the protein's original structure. Our results demonstrate that DPO effectively reduces MHC-I visibility without compromising the structural integrity of the proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.791

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it