MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408586797 · doi:10.1093/protein/gzaf003

Tuning ProteinMPNN to reduce protein visibility via MHC Class I through direct preference optimization

2025· article· en· W4408586797 on OpenAlexaff
Hans-Christof Gasser, Diego A. Oyarzún, Javier A. Alfaro, Ajitha Rajan

Bibliographic record

VenueProtein Engineering Design and Selection · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsCanadian Asian Studies AssociationUniversity of Victoria
FundersInfrastruktura PL-GridFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejEuropean CommissionRoyal Academy of EngineeringEuropean Regional Development FundHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeUK Research and InnovationIntelligence Community Postdoctoral Research Fellowship ProgramIsrael Cancer Research Fund
KeywordsMHC class IComputer scienceVisibilityMajor histocompatibility complexEpitopeWorkflowComputational biologyImmune systemAntigenBiologyGeneticsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ProteinMPNN is widely used in protein design workflows due to its ability to identify amino acid sequences that fold into specific 3D protein structures. In our work, we adjust ProteinMPNN to design proteins for a given 3D protein structure with reduced immune-visibility to cytotoxic T lymphocytes that recognize proteins via the MHC-I pathway. To achieve this, we developed a novel framework that integrates direct preference optimization (DPO)-a tuning method originally designed for large language models-with MHC-I peptide presentation predictions. This approach fosters the generation of designs with fewer MHC-I epitopes while preserving the protein's original structure. Our results demonstrate that DPO effectively reduces MHC-I visibility without compromising the structural integrity of the proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtein Engineering Design and SelectionSame topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207