Safety and efficacy of chronic weekly rozanolixizumab in generalized myasthenia gravis: the randomized open-label extension MG0004 study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the Phase 3 MycarinG study (NCT03971422), six once-weekly subcutaneous infusions of rozanolixizumab significantly improved myasthenia gravis (MG)-specific outcomes versus placebo in patients with acetylcholine receptor or muscle-specific tyrosine kinase autoantibody-positive generalized MG (gMG). Following completion of MycarinG, patients could enroll in the open-label extension MG0004 study (NCT04124965) to receive chronic weekly rozanolixizumab. METHODS: Patients were re-randomized 1:1 to once-weekly rozanolixizumab 7 or 10 mg/kg for up to 52 infusions. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to rozanolixizumab discontinuation. After ≥6 visits/infusions patients could switch to the MG0007 study (NCT04650854) to receive cyclic rozanolixizumab treatment. RESULTS: In MG0004, 70 patients received rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg (n = 35) or 10 mg/kg (n = 35). Mean treatment duration was 22.9 and 23.7 weeks, respectively, due to rollover into MG0007. TEAEs were reported in 60/70 (85.7%) patients; most were mild/moderate. The most frequently reported TEAEs were headache (25/70 [35.7%]), diarrhea (13/70 [18.6%]) and decreased blood immunoglobulin G (11/70 [15.7%]). There were no opportunistic, serious or severe infections, serious or severe hypersensitivity or injection-site reactions, any anaphylactic reactions or albumin or lipid abnormalities. Maximum mean reduction from baseline in MG Activities of Daily Living score was 3.1 in the 7 mg/kg group and 4.1 in the 10 mg/kg group. CONCLUSION: Chronic weekly rozanolixizumab for up to 52 infusions was generally well tolerated, and clinically relevant improvements across MG-specific outcomes were maintained, supporting the long-term use of rozanolixizumab in patients with gMG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04124965 (registered October 11, 2019).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".