Gait Assessment in the Transtibial Mercer Universal Prosthesis Designed with a “Neutral Alignment” Socket
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Standardizing socket design and maintaining a default socket alignment in transtibial prostheses are innovations that aim to simplify fitting procedures and reduce prosthetic service costs, particularly in low-income countries. Objectives: This study evaluated the Mercer Universal Prosthesis (MUP) with a standardized “neutral alignment” against custom-made conventional prostheses (CVPs). Methods: Twenty transtibial amputees (n = 20) completed gait assessments using their CVP and immediately after fitting with an MUP. Temporal–spatial and sagittal plane kinematics (hip, knee, and ankle angles) were analyzed, along with a gait symmetry index. Results: the MUP group reported a significant difference between the prosthetic and the intact limb for both hip and knee kinematics (p < 0.05), but there was no change in the CVP group. When compared with the sound limb in the MUP group, post hoc analysis showed that both hip flexion and the hip range of motion (ROM) in the MUP limb significantly increased by 5.7° and 7.3° (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Spatial and temporal gait parameters were comparable between the MUP and CVP groups, and gait symmetry showed no significant differences. The CVP showed greater symmetry in terms of hip (19%, p = 0.012) and knee flexion (8%, p = 0.026) compared to the MUP, while the MUP had higher plantarflexion symmetry (24.4%, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Immediately post fitting, MUP improved joint mobility in the prosthetic limb, potentially enhancing kinematics. While short-term benefits are evident, further research is needed to assess long-term gait adaptation and quality of life impacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".