Development and validation of an epigenetic signature of allostatic load
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The allostatic load (AL) concept measures physiological dysregulation in response to internal and external stressors that accumulate across the life course. AL has been consistently linked to chronic disease risk across studies. However, there is considerable variation in its operationalization. In the present study, DNA methylation (DNAm) data (using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array) from the Swiss Kidney Project on Genes in Hypertension (SKIPOGH) cohort, a Swiss-based family cohort study, were used in a discovery epigenome-wide association study to identify cytosine-guanine nucleotide sites associated with phenotypic measures of AL. Elastic net linear regression models were used to estimate an epigenetic signature of AL (methAL), including an Illumina HumanMethylation450K (HM450K) assay-compatible signature (methALT). The methALT signature was validated in the 1936 Lothian Birth Cohort (LBC1936), population-based prospective cohort study. We found that the methAL signature was positively associated with the clinical phenotype of AL in both the SKIPOGH (R2 = 0.59) and LBC1936 (R2 = 0.16) cohorts. In the validation cohort, a one standard deviation increase in methALT signature was associated with 25% higher odds of reported history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (odd ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.50), and a nearly two-fold increase in all-cause mortality rate at the beginning of follow-up (hazard ratio = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.33-2.13) when adjusting for all potential confounders. In conclusion, the epigenetic signature for AL not only correlated well with phenotype-based AL scores but also exhibited a stronger association with the history of CVD and all-cause mortality compared with AL scores. The methAL signature could help assuage issues of comparison across studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".