The Role of HVAF Nozzle Design and Process Parameters on In-Flight Particle Oxidation and Microstructure of NiCoCrAlY Coatings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing demand to deposit dense and oxidation-resistant bond coats requires reliable and efficient deposition techniques. High-Velocity Air-Fuel (HVAF), among other thermal spray processes, is showcasing consistent potential to optimize spraying techniques and deposition strategies for depositing NiCoCrAlY coatings. NiCoCrAlY coatings are sensitive to high-temperature oxidation, and preserving the aluminum reservoir in the bond coats is of the highest priority to potentially resist oxidation during thermal cycling. Contrary to the existing literature on comparing carbide-based HVAF deposition with other processes, this work investigates the specific role of nozzle configurations. It primarily focuses on in-flight particle characteristics using diagnostic tools and the corresponding inflight particle oxidation of NiCoCrAlY feedstock. This work details individual splat and coating characteristics, revealing the significant influence of nozzle configurations. A comprehensive understanding of process–material–microstructure correlations was established using a commercially available NiCoCrAlY coating system. Comprehensive discussions on nozzle configurations over various feedstock powder characteristics were carried out in this work. Advanced characterization techniques were employed to assess the in-flight particle oxidation and coating microstructure using focused ion beam (FIB), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".