MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408622064 · doi:10.1016/j.ijregi.2025.100576

Perspectives on tuberculosis in migrants, refugees, and displaced populations in Europe

2025· review· en· W4408622064 on OpenAlexaff
Rizwan Ahmed, Adam Zumla, E. Laurette Taylor, Eleni Aklillu, Giovanni Satta

Bibliographic record

VenueIJID Regions · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune responses and vaccinations
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersQIAGEN
KeywordsRefugeeTuberculosisDisplaced personPolitical scienceInternally displaced personDevelopment economicsDemographic economicsGeographyMedicineEconomicsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Finding and treating all tuberculosis (TB) types in migrants and refugees in Europe is challenging. • TB prevalence is higher in migrants from endemic areas and with social risk factors. • Community-based and integrated multi-disease approaches have enhanced TB programs. • Policy variation, limited resources, and barriers to services hinder migrant TB care. • Urgent need for more investment into TB services in Europe for refugees and migrants. Finding and treating all forms of tuberculosis (TB) (latent, drug-susceptible, drug-resistant, multidrug-resistant, and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis) among migrants, displaced populations, and refugees are important challenges facing TB control programs in Europe. Many of these populations live in poor conditions, with limited access to healthcare and TB services. Ever-increasing armed conflicts in Europe and other parts of the world continue to exacerbate rates of migration to and within Europe, with considerable implications for health services. TB in Europe is more prevalent in migrants from high TB-endemic areas, as well as those with social risk factors, including poverty and poor housing or homelessness. We provide our perspectives on recent data on TB in Europe from the World Health Organization, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the United Kingdom Health Security Agency, and other 2023-2024 reports. Despite advancements in TB screening and prevention strategies, and treatment regimens including community-based and integrated multi-disease approaches, significant challenges remain. These include variations in national policies, resource limitations, and barriers to accessing healthcare. To help address these challenges, there is a need for clearer guidance through national policies, enhanced surveillance, and proactive community engagement There is also an urgent need for more investment into TB health services in Europe for refugees, migrants, and other displaced populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIJID RegionsSame topicImmune responses and vaccinationsFrench-language works237,207