MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408649057 · doi:10.58837/chula.the.2013.1674

Development of a subunit vaccine and Diagnostic assays against porcine circovirus type 2

2013· dissertation· en· W4408649057 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Suphattra Jitiimanee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Virus Infections Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorcine circovirusVirologySerologyCapsidCircovirusVaccinationGenotypeBiologyAntibodyAdjuvantVaccine efficacyVirusImmunologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) was first recognized as a causative agent of porcine circovirus associated diseases (PCVAD) in Canada in 1991. Subsequently, PMWS has become a major economic problem to the swine industry worldwide including Thailand. Importantly, virological, serological study and also development of vaccine and serological assay are useful for prevention and control of PCVAD. Genetic characterizations of PCV2 isolates from Thai pigs with PCVAD during 2007-2010 revealed that all recent Thai PCV2 sequences belong to genotype 1 (PCV2b) and subgroup 1A/B was predominated in this study. Later, an indirect ELISA was developed and validated for PCV2 antibody detection using a recombinant truncated capsid (rntCap) protein from PCV2b genotype expressed in E. coli system. Swine serum samples were obtained and tested using the indirect ELISA comparing with IPMA as a gold standard for serological assay. The results demonstrated that the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of a developed indirect ELISA are 98.33%, 93.33% and 96.67%, respectively. Finally, the efficacy of a developed subunit PCV2b vaccine using a rntCap protein expressed in E. coli was determined in PCVAD-affected farm. The results indicated that vaccination by a developed subunit PCV2b vaccine could induce specific antibody and partially control PCV2 viral load in serum suggesting that using higher protein concentration dose and/or using an appropriate adjuvant could enhance the better efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnimal Virus Infections StudiesFrench-language works237,207