MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408650135 · doi:10.1080/17476348.2025.2481956

The risk of stroke-related pneumonia: a systematic review of peripheral immunodepression markers

2025· review· en· W4408650135 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. Mello, Scarleth Andreghetto, Maiara de Aguiar da Costa, Victória Linden de Rezende, Cinara Ludvig Gonçalves, Amanda Della Giustina, Fabrícia Petronilho

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Respiratory Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsStem Cell NetworkOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)PneumoniaPeripheralIntensive care medicineImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Ischemic stroke (IS)-associated pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality after stroke, driven by peripheral immune imbalance. This systematic review evaluates immunosuppression markers associated with pneumonia following IS in clinical studies. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS databases until March 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised clinical studies assessing IS-related immunosuppression and pneumonia, excluding in vitro and animal studies. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Results A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria, analyzing 1,833 post-stroke patients. Findings indicate that increased interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, alongside decreased repulsive guidance molecule A (RGM-A), are early indicators of post-stroke pneumonia. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity in study methodologies and populations.Conclusions Elevated IL-6, IL-10, and CRP levels, along with reduced RGM-A, are associated with post-stroke pneumonia, emphasizing the role of immune dysregulation in its pathophysiology. Despite promising findings, further studies with standardized detection techniques are needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient prognosis. The variability in study methodologies presents a limitation to drawing definitive conclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Respiratory MedicineSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207