Treatment of Rumination Syndrome with Constitutional Homeopathy in a 6-Year-Old Child: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Rumination syndrome, characterized by repeated regurgitation of ingested food, is an underdiagnosed condition with no consensus on treatment. Homeopathic management has not been suggested or reported. This case report details successful treatment using constitutional homeopathy. Case Description: A 6-year-old Caribbean-Canadian female experienced food regurgitation after most meals for 8 months triggered by emotional stress. Symptoms persisted despite previous treatments, including lansoprazole, digestive enzymes, probiotics, gluten and dairy elimination, and abdominal castor oil application. Abdominal ultrasound and endoscopy showed no abnormalities. A constitutional homeopathic intake suggested a mental-emotional component, leading to the prescription of Phosphorus 200CH at one pellet once a day for 3 days. Initial dosing reduced regurgitation frequency, with significant improvement after re-dosing at one pellet twice a day for 5 days. Anxiety and stress-provoking events retriggered regurgitation episodes, but re-dosing Phosphorus at one pellet twice a day for 5 days significantly reduced regurgitation. Conclusion: Constitutional homeopathy significantly reduced regurgitation frequency in a 6-year-old with rumination syndrome triggered by anxiety and stress. This case suggests that mental-emotional factors may underlie rumination syndrome and supports the potential efficacy of constitutional homeopathy. Future studies should explore these processes and assess homeopathy’s efficacy through small trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".