MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408667187 · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf180

Current Practices in Monitoring Children and Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia: A Global Survey of Expert Experience

2025· article· en· W4408667187 on OpenAlexafffund
Dalal S. Ali, Farah Alsarraf, Hajar Abu Alrob, R. Todd Alexander, Abdulrahman Almoulia, Natasha M. Appelman‐Dijkstra, Signe Sparre Beck‐Nielsen, Martin Biosse Duplan, Maria Luisa Brandi, Thomas O. Carpenter, Catherine Chaussain, Martine Cohen‐Solal, Rachel Crowley, Karel Dandurand, Pablo Florenzano, Claudia Gagnon, Paul Goodyer, Chelsey Grimbly, Salma Hussein, Erik A. Imel, Suzanne M. Jan de Beur, M K Javaid, Anna Lehman, Willem F. Lems, E. Michael Lewiecki, Ciara McDonnell, Reza Mirza, Emmett Morgante, Anthony A. Portale, Yumie Rhee, Heide Siggelkow, Laura L. Tosi, Leanne M. Ward, Gordon Guyatt, Aliya Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of OttawaWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of WaterlooMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of AlbertaUniversité LavalMcMaster UniversityUniversité de SherbrookeChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioImpact
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesMcMaster University
KeywordsMedicineNephrocalcinosisHypophosphatemiaPediatricsPhysical examinationFamily historyCreatinineInternal medicineKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report provides recommendations for X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) monitoring based on current monitoring practices of experts in the management of XLH in children (<18 years) and adults. We surveyed 43 international experts in XLH to determine their monitoring practices for children and adults with XLH, including pregnant and lactating women. In the initial evaluation of children and adults with XLH, experts consistently obtain a family history of XLH or hypophosphatemia, a history of fractures and dental infections, and assess pain through age-appropriate clinical interviews or caregiver reports. They measure height, weight, and blood pressure and conduct DNA analysis of multiple genes associated with hypophosphatemia including the PHEX gene. For children follow-up, experts arrange follow-up every 3 to 6 months assessing height, weight, and blood pressure and examining for skeletal deformities. Laboratory tests in children include serum phosphorus, corrected total/ionized calcium, alkaline phosphatase, renal function, and PTH and spot morning urine for calcium, creatinine, and phosphorus. During adult follow-up, experts assess patients every 6 to 12 months, with a clinical examination focused on skeletal deformities and joint involvement. The laboratory profile is completed at least once a year. In the presence of bone pain, experts conduct X-rays both in children and adults to evaluate for fractures or joint damage. With respect to nephrocalcinosis, renal ultrasound is suggested on an annual basis or less frequently when monitoring children and adults with XLH. Experts conduct a dental assessment at baseline and then every 6 to 12 months for all patients with XLH. The findings of the survey inform practice for assessing new patients with XLH, monitoring existing patients, and identifying areas for future research. All recommendations based on these practices are weak with very low-quality evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism→Same topicBone health and treatments→French-language works237,207→