Fast Screening of Tuberculosis Patients Based on Analysis of Plasma by Infrared Spectroscopy Coupled with Machine Learning Approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Prompt diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) enables timely treatment, limiting spread and improving public health for this disease. Currently, a rapid, sensitive, accurate, and cost-effective detection of TB still remains a challenge. For this purpose, we engaged a transmission skill and an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) technique coupled with Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) to study the IR spectra of the plasma samples from TB patients ( n = 10) and healthy individuals ( n = 10). To ensure high-quality spectral data, spectra were collected in both transmission and ATR modes, with each measurement consisting of 256 scans at a resolution of 8 cm –1 . For the transmission mode, measurements were repeated five times per sample, while ATR-FTIR measurements were repeated three times per sample. These parameters were carefully optimized through rigorous testing to achieve the highest possible signal-to-noise ratio for patient sample analysis. Using this method, we obtained a total of 100 spectra from 20 samples in the transmission mode and 60 spectra in the ATR-FTIR mode, ensuring sufficient data for robust spectral analysis. Further, we applied machine learning techniques to analyze and classify the IR spectra; by this means, we differentiated those spectra between TB patients and healthy ones. In this work, we modified the transmission-FTIR setup to improve the absorption sensitivity by focusing the IR light on the interface of the sample; while, we used a high-refractive-index crystal ZnSe as a medium to reflect the signals in ATR scheme. Routinely, we compared the spectra obtained from both methods; in their second derivative curves, we notified that there had distinct spectral differences in protein and lipid regions (3500–3000, 2900–2800, and 1700–1500 cm –1 ) between TB and healthy groups. Using three machine learning classifiers─Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost (Xg)─we found that the Xg achieved an accuracy of 0.749, precision of 0.703, recall of 0.901, F1 score of 0.790, and an AUC of the ROC curve of 0.82 for absorption spectra in the 3500–2700 cm –1 region; additionally, the machine learning practice showed that ATR data possessed performance parameters of ∼ 80% in accuracy. We randomly assigned participants (rather than individual scans) to 80% training and 20% test sets to train and validate three machine learning models (LR, RF, and Xg). Based on the results, we concluded that the absorption spectroscopic method demonstrated its superior performance in TB diagnosis. Thus, we have showed that absorption-FTIR spectroscopy is a valuable tool for sorting the TB disease from patients. The spectral IR analysis of plasmas can complement clinical evidence and provides a rapid and accurate diagnosis of TB in clinic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".