MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408668766 · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2025.104732

A randomized controlled trial of online mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral interventions for sexual interest/arousal disorder in women: eSense

2025· article· en· W4408668766 on OpenAlex
Elizabeth A. Mahar, Kyle R. Stephenson, Lori A. Brotto

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBehaviour Research and Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMindfulnessArousalPsychologyRandomized controlled trialPsychological interventionClinical psychologyPsychotherapistMindfulness-based cognitive therapyCognitionSexual arousalCognitive therapyCognitive behavioral therapySexual behaviorPsychiatryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sexual interest/arousal disorder (SIAD) is a common and distressing sexual dysfunction in women. Although efficacious psychological treatments for SIAD exist, they are generally underutilized and inaccessible. eSense is a feasible and useable online intervention containing Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Mindfulness-Based Therapy (MBT) programs. Our goal was to test the efficacy of the CBT and MBT arms of eSense relative to a waitlist control condition. Women with SIAD were randomized to eSense -CBT ( n = 43), eSense -MBT ( n = 43), or a waitlist ( n = 43). Both interventions consisted of 8 modules with a recommended completion time of 8–12 weeks. Participants also met remotely with non-expert “navigators” for up to 12 weeks. Participants completed validated self-report measures of primary outcomes (sexual desire/arousal and distress) and secondary outcomes (sexual satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and overall sexual function) at baseline, mid-treatment, posttreatment, and 6-month posttreatment. Compared to waitlist, both active treatment groups reported significant improvements in primary outcomes at post-treatment (desire/arousal d > .90; sexual distress d < −0.62) and these improvements were generally maintained at follow-up. The two active treatments did not differ in terms of primary outcomes. Effects on sexual satisfaction were also significant ( d = 0.70–0.81) and MBT resulted in slightly greater improvements. There was no effect on sexual dissatisfaction. For overall sexual function, the effect was large ( d = 1.20 to 1.23) with no between-arm differences. Future steps to improve engagement and increase access are discussed. Keywords: digital health; sexual interest/arousal disorder; mindfulness-based therapy; cognitive behavioral therapy; sexual dysfunction. Public health significance : This study strongly suggests that eSense is an efficacious digital health tool that holds much potential to improve accessibility for the treatment of SIAD. • eSense , an online program for sexual dysfunction in women, can be used alongside non-expert support. • eSense resulted in significant improvement in key symptoms of sexual dysfunction over and above a waitlist, and these improvements were maintained for 6 months. • There was little difference in outcomes between mindfulness-based therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy, suggesting both may be efficacious.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it