MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408669130 · doi:10.3390/healthcare13060677

Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Diclofenac and Thiocolchicoside in the Treatment of Low Back Pain and Other Conditions: Systematic Review of the Literature

2025· review· en· W4408669130 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ioannis Oikonomou, Karolina Akinosoglou

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiclofenacObservational studyPlaceboRandomized controlled trialSystematic reviewAdverse effectLow back painPhysical therapyAlternative medicineMEDLINEInternal medicinePharmacologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and thiocolchicoside, a muscle relaxant, are commonly combined to target inflammation and muscle spasm. However, the efficacy and safety of their combination remain under discussion. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of diclofenac-thiocolchicoside therapy for LBP and other musculoskeletal conditions. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing diclofenac-thiocolchicoside combination with placebo, monotherapy, or alternative treatments. A search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and relevant websites, identifying articles published up to 30 September 2024. Studies from trial registries were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias for randomized trials (RoB 2) for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. Evidence certainty was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Results were visualized using Robvis, tables, and graphs. Results: Of 393 identified records, 9 studies (1097 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Seven RCTs reported significant pain reduction and functional improvement with combination therapy compared to placebo or active controls. However, study heterogeneity, dosage variations, and risk of bias limited comparability. Adverse events (AEs) included gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort and drowsiness, though no severe complications were consistently reported. Conclusions: Despite methodological limitations, the diclofenac-thiocolchicoside combination demonstrates promising efficacy for acute LBP and musculoskeletal pain management. However, there is no clear evidence of its clinical superiority over other available treatments, due to study heterogeneity and potential biases. Rigorous, standardized research with larger sample sizes and consistent methodologies is essential to definitively establish the efficacy and safety of diclofenac-thiocolchicoside, providing clearer guidance for clinical decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcareSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207