MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408672606 · doi:10.1002/ima.70063

<scp>MEDCnet</scp> : A Memory Efficient Approach for Processing High‐Resolution Fundus Images for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification Using <scp>CNN</scp>

2025· article· en· W4408672606 on OpenAlex
Mohsin Butt, Majid Ali Khan, Ghazanfar Latif, Abul Bashar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
FundersKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsFundus (uterus)Computer scienceDiabetic retinopathyOphthalmologyMedicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Modern medical imaging equipment can capture very high‐resolution images with detailed features. These high‐resolution images have been used in several domains. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a medical condition where increased blood sugar levels of diabetic patients affect the retinal vessels of the eye. The usage of high‐resolution fundus images in DR classification is quite limited due to Graphics processing unit (GPU) memory constraints. The GPU memory problem becomes even worse with the increased complexity of the current state‐of‐the‐art deep learning models. In this paper, we propose a memory‐efficient divide‐and‐conquer‐based approach for training deep learning models that can identify both high‐level and detailed low‐level features from high‐resolution images within given GPU memory constraints. The proposed approach initially uses the traditional transfer learning technique to train the deep learning model with reduced‐sized images. This trained model is used to extract detailed low‐level features from fixed‐size patches of higher‐resolution fundus images. These detailed features are then utilized for classification based on standard machine learning algorithms. We have evaluated our proposed approach using the DDR and APTOS datasets. The results of our approach are compared with different approaches, and our model achieves a maximum classification accuracy of 95.92% and 97.39% on the DDR and APTOS datasets, respectively. In general, the proposed approach can be used to get better accuracy by using detailed features from high‐resolution images within GPU memory constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it