MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408672938 · doi:10.1101/2025.03.17.25324124

Genotype-Epigenome-Phenotype Integration Reveals the Contributions of Peripheral Immune Cells to Bipolar Disorder Pathogenesis, Phenotypic Heterogeneity, and Therapy

2025· preprint· en· W4408672938 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Hou, Yue Li, Xushen Xiong, Yosuke Tanigawa, Yongjin Park, Samuel W. Lenz, Amy Grayson, Jeong‐Heon Lee, Euijung Ryu, Janet E. Olson, Joanna M. Biernacka, Mark A. Frye, Tamás Ördög, Manolis Kellis

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigenomePhenotypePathogenesisGenetic heterogeneityBiologyBipolar disorderImmune systemGeneticsEpigenesisGenotypeEpigeneticsImmunologyGeneNeuroscienceDNA methylationGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Immune dysfunctions are believed to contribute to bipolar disorder (BD), yet their mechanistic basis remains unclear. To address this, we systematically characterize BD-associated epigenomic and genetic variation in peripheral blood immune cells by profiling and integrating 833 genome-wide maps of five histone modification marks across 180 individuals (88 Type I BD patients, 92 controls), coupled with whole-genome sequencing data and rich medical records. We annotate 450k candidate cis - regulatory elements (CREs) and identify differential CREs (dCREs) in BD patients, suggesting down-regulated adaptive and up-regulated innate immune response. We predict candidate BD driver genes in the circulating immune system, which frequently show matched brain activity mainly related to calcium signaling and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) transport, suggesting dysregulated synaptic transmission, neuronal plasticity, and ER stress. We find that candidate driver genes are often linked to BD GWAS variants through blood-specific eQTLs not found in any brain cell types, indicating potential causal roles of circulating immune cells in bipolar disorder. We then infer 24 latent factors of BD-differential CRE variation and use them to group the patients into five epigenomic subtypes, which also show distinct disease phenotypes, including infection and inflammation, osmotic laxative use and glucose intolerance, quetiapine use, and hypertension. We next associate immune-partitioned BD polygenic risk scores with patient epigenomic subtypes, revealing the genetic basis of BD patient heterogeneity captured by blood epigenomics. Lastly, by analyzing transcriptional responses to known pharmacological interventions in hematopoietic cells that enrich BD patient group-specific dysregulated genes, we identify drugs/compounds that could be repurposed for ameliorating BD-associated immune dysfunction in a patient group-dependent manner. Overall, based on our study of genotype-epigenome-phenotype integration, we infer a potentially causal role of immune cells in BD, offering insights into biomarkers, subtypes, and precision medicine interventions targeting peripheral immune dysfunction and thus advancing precision medicine in BD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicImmune Cell Function and Interaction→French-language works237,207→