MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408673957 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v28i1.a01

Optimization of Comfort and Saturated Magnetic and Electromagnetic Properties of Polyester Fabric Impregnated with Silica/Kaolinite/Silver In-Situ to Protect the Human Body

2025· article· en· W4408673957 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ehsan Zarinabadi, Ramin Abghari, Ali Nazari, Mohammad Mirjalili

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectromagnetic wave absorption materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKaolinitePolyesterIn situMaterials scienceComposite materialChemical engineeringChemistryMetallurgyEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, silica/Kaolinite/silver nanocomposites were synthesized according to experimental design results, using the central composite design (CCD) method.Samples were synthesized by impregnation on the polyester fabric, to get an in-situ approach to make a new performance of the polyester fabric to protect the human body from dangerous magnetic waves.Initially, magnetic saturation of the designed specimens was tested and its optimum values were measured with a Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM) device.Mechanical properties including tensile strength, friction, abrasion, hydrophobicity (drop absorption), bending, thickness, and Crease Recovery Angle (CRA) of polyester fabrics impregnated with different amounts of nano-composite components were investigated using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and PLS statistical methods which can help to show the effect of variables on each other.FESEM, EDX, and FTIR analyses were conducted for raw polyester-impregnated nanocomposites using an in-situ method under optimum conditions.The results confirm that the polyester fabric impregnated with threecomponent nanocomposite by varying concentrations of silica, Kaolinite, and silver, can significantly enhance the properties of saturation magnetic, strength, abrasion, friction, hydrophobicity, bending, thickness, air permeability, and CRA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicElectromagnetic wave absorption materialsFrench-language works237,207