Perspectives on Continuing Care, From Home Care to Long‐Term Care, for Older People Living With HIV: A Cross‐Sectional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aims: Older (≥ 50 years) persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) comprise the majority of individuals receiving HIV care in high-income countries. PLWH experience the challenges of aging at earlier ages and accelerated rates, compared to people without HIV. Older PLWH who may benefit from more support may hesitate due to fear of stigma, discrimination, or past experiences. Methods: We assessed the views of older PLWH through an online survey. We sought participants' views, experiences, knowledge and preferences for delivery of continuing care support in Alberta, Canada. Participants were invited during clinic visits at the Southern Alberta Clinic in Calgary, Canada. Results: = 32) currently receive help with activities of daily living, 70% of which was provided by family/friends. Nine percent expressed concern with receiving help, including financial (54%), loss of independence (31%), and privacy concerns (31%). Nearly 47% expressed concern about healthcare providers' knowledge of HIV, 63% expressed concern about their medical information being kept confidential, and 64% expressed concern about other residents learning of their HIV diagnosis. Conclusions: Despite a need, many older PLWH are hesitant to accept home care or move into supportive, facility-based living. This leaves a potential void in the necessary provision of care. This must be addressed to ensure equity, diversity, and inclusion, and to remove barriers in accessing health and social supports. The solutions to this urgent need lie with those with lived experience who can inform healthcare providers and policy-makers. To start, healthcare providers and policymakers must educate staff about the ongoing stigma and discrimination experienced by older PLWH and demonstrate to patients the value placed on patient privacy and confidentiality. Impact Statement: We certify that this work is novel clinical research that provides insight into the values and preferences of older people living with HIV regarding continuing care (from home care to supportive living and long-term care). This work is the foundation for creating meaningful, structural changes to how continuing care is provided to older people living with HIV, an underrepresented and equity-deserving group. Despite a need, many older PLWH are hesitant to accept home care or move into supportive, facility-based living. This leaves a potential void in the necessary provision of care. This must be addressed to ensure equity, diversity, and inclusion, and to remove barriers in accessing health and social supports. To start, healthcare providers and policymakers must educate staff about the ongoing stigma and discrimination experienced by older PLWH and demonstrate to patients the value placed on patient privacy and confidentiality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".