MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408680171 · doi:10.21091/mppa.2025.01003

Injury Rates in Youth Street Dancers

2025· article· en· W4408680171 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lan Mai Tran, M. Critchley, Ilsa J Shill, Andrés Morales La Madrid, A. E. George, Carolyn A. Emery, Sarah Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Problems of Performing Artists · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDancePhysical therapyMedicineInjury preventionPoison controlIncidence (geometry)PsychologyMedical emergencyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: An increased concern for injury risk is associated with the rising popularity in street dance. Stunting movements in street dance are comparable to movements in aesthetic sports with documented high risks of concussions (e.g., cheerleading and gymnastics). Limited literature comments on street dance-related injuries and concussions in youth. PURPOSE: To assess dance-related injury risk among youth street dancers aged 11-19 years across a 6-month term in Calgary, Canada. METHODS: This prospective cohort study is a substudy of the national Surveillance in High Schools to Reduce Concussions study (SHRed Concussions). Dancers aged 11-19 years and registered in at least one street dance class/week in the 2021-2022 season were recruited from private dance studios and high school dance teams in Calgary. Team designates completed weekly exposure forms detailing street dance style, participation (full, partial), and injury circumstance (dance/non-dance injury). Suspected self-reported physical complaint injuries/concussions were referred to sport medicine physicians/therapists for follow-up. Analysis included descriptive statistics (participant demographics, injury characteristics), injury incidence rate (no. of new injuries/1,000 dance-hours, 95%CI), and prevalence (%, 95%CI). RESULTS: Forty dancers (20 female) with a median age of 16.2 years (range 11.1-19.8) participated and reported 19 dance-related injuries. Proportion of dancers reporting at least 1 physical complaint was 37.5% and the estimated injury incidence rate was 4.5 injuries/1,000 dance-hours (95%CI: 4.4, 7.5). Injuries occurred most frequently in the knee (47.4%) and during breaking (44.4%). Most injuries were acute onset (57.9%) and classified as joint/ligament sprains (33.3%) and muscle strains (33.3%). One concussion was reported. CONCLUSION: The prevalence and incidence of physical complaint injuries in youth street dancers is high with the majority categorized as acute and occurring in the knee. Further epidemiological research in youth street dance is needed to identify potential risk factors and inform risk reduction strategies in this unique dancer population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Problems of Performing ArtistsSame topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207