Identification of Behaviorally Active Odorants for Adult <i>Chilo sacchariphagus</i> Based on the Binding Properties of Odorant-Binding Proteins toward Host Volatiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chilo sacchariphagus is the key pest of sugar cane. Due to the difficulty associated with pesticide application in middle and late growth stages of sugar cane, the use of odorant attractants is a beneficial alternative to pesticides. Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) in the insect olfactory system represent excellent targets for screening odorant attractants. Here, we identified 12 OBPs from the head transcriptome of C. sacchariphagus adults, with four OBPs ( CsacOBP1 /2/5/12) highly enriched in adult antennae. Ligand-binding assays for the four CsacOBPs showed that they can bind with 10 of the 30 host volatiles tested. Behavioral assays revealed that (+)-cedrol and 1-hexadecanol from the 10 compounds can attract the moths of both sexes. Protein–ligand interaction analyses identified five key amino acid residues involved in CsacOBPs’ binding to (+)-cedrol and 1-hexadecanol. These findings have enhanced our molecular understanding of the host plant selection in C. sacchariphagus and have facilitated the development of attractants for C. sacchariphagus .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".