Claudin 18 (43–14A clone) expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Assessment of a potential clinical biomarker for zolbetuximab therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Phase 2 trials are underway for zolbetuximab therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. • Claudin 18 (43–14A clone) immunohistochemistry determines zolbetuximab eligibility. • Claudin 18 expression with 43–14A is unclear in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. • We found 32.5 % of PDACs express Claudin 18 using the 43–14A antibody clone. • Claudin 18 expression associates with lower grade and better median overall survival. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains highly lethal, with a five-year survival rate below 15 %. Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a novel potential therapeutic target in PDAC. Zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CLDN18.2, has demonstrated therapeutic benefit in gastric cancers and is now in phase 2 clinical trials for PDAC. Trial eligibility for zolbetuximab requires tumor membranous immunohistochemical staining with the pan-claudin 18 companion diagnostic antibody clone 43–14A. However, the expression of CLDN18 detected using this clone has only been evaluated in 62 patients from a single retrospective study. Herein, we report immunohistochemical staining using 43–14A on surgically resected PDAC samples ( n = 120). Samples were stained following the protocol used in clinical trials, using the 43–14A VENTANA antibody in a prediluted kit, and according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol. Positive cases were defined as ≥ 75 % of tumor cells exhibiting membranous staining with an intensity of ≥ 2+. Out of 120 PDAC cases, 39 (32.5 %) stained positive for CLDN18 with 43–14A. A significant association was observed between lower tumor grade and higher 43–14A staining ( p < 0.05). CLDN18-positive cases demonstrated significantly improved survival at the cohort's median overall survival (23 months, p < 0.05), suggesting that claudin expression could serve as a both a diagnostic and prognostic marker. Our findings indicate that 32.5 % of PDAC tumors in this cohort are positive for CLDN18, suggesting that a significant proportion of patients with PDAC could benefit from zolbetuximab and other CLDN18.2 targeted immunotherapies if pancreatic cancer therapeutic trials prove successful.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".