MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408684251 · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102362

Claudin 18 (43–14A clone) expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Assessment of a potential clinical biomarker for zolbetuximab therapy

2025· article· en· W4408684251 on OpenAlex
Riley J. Arseneau, Emma Kempster, Carley Bekkers, Boris Gala-López, Ravi Ramjeesingh, J. Boudreau, Thomas Arnason

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Health AuthorityBeatrice Hunter Cancer Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaBiomarkerclone (Java method)MedicineClaudinCancer researchOncologyInternal medicinePathologyBiologyPancreatic cancerCancerTight junctionCell biologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Phase 2 trials are underway for zolbetuximab therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. • Claudin 18 (43–14A clone) immunohistochemistry determines zolbetuximab eligibility. • Claudin 18 expression with 43–14A is unclear in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. • We found 32.5 % of PDACs express Claudin 18 using the 43–14A antibody clone. • Claudin 18 expression associates with lower grade and better median overall survival. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains highly lethal, with a five-year survival rate below 15 %. Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a novel potential therapeutic target in PDAC. Zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CLDN18.2, has demonstrated therapeutic benefit in gastric cancers and is now in phase 2 clinical trials for PDAC. Trial eligibility for zolbetuximab requires tumor membranous immunohistochemical staining with the pan-claudin 18 companion diagnostic antibody clone 43–14A. However, the expression of CLDN18 detected using this clone has only been evaluated in 62 patients from a single retrospective study. Herein, we report immunohistochemical staining using 43–14A on surgically resected PDAC samples ( n = 120). Samples were stained following the protocol used in clinical trials, using the 43–14A VENTANA antibody in a prediluted kit, and according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol. Positive cases were defined as ≥ 75 % of tumor cells exhibiting membranous staining with an intensity of ≥ 2+. Out of 120 PDAC cases, 39 (32.5 %) stained positive for CLDN18 with 43–14A. A significant association was observed between lower tumor grade and higher 43–14A staining ( p < 0.05). CLDN18-positive cases demonstrated significantly improved survival at the cohort's median overall survival (23 months, p < 0.05), suggesting that claudin expression could serve as a both a diagnostic and prognostic marker. Our findings indicate that 32.5 % of PDAC tumors in this cohort are positive for CLDN18, suggesting that a significant proportion of patients with PDAC could benefit from zolbetuximab and other CLDN18.2 targeted immunotherapies if pancreatic cancer therapeutic trials prove successful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it