MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The social context of women’s health: an analysis of international experience and Ukrainian realities through the lens of gender

2024· article· en· W4408684891 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrii Chernov, Larysa Kalchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial pedagogy theory and practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHuman Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianContext (archaeology)Lens (geology)Gender studiesSociologyPolitical scienceOptometryMedicineGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article examines key aspects shaping women’s health in the social dimension. The authors emphasize the relevance of analyzing social determinants of health, particularly their impact on women’s quality of life and wellbeing. The issue addressed stems from the need for a deeper understanding of gender aspects in healthcare and their role in forming effective social policy. The study analyzes research on gender differences in health, economic and social factors influencing its levels. Among the highlighted factors are studies on gender inequality, working conditions, income levels, social isolation, and access to resources. The article reviews Canada’s experience as a country with extensive research on the social aspects of citizens’ health. At the same time, it highlights the lack of similar studies in the Ukrainian context. Several unresolved issues are identified, including: how changes in gender roles and structural inequality affect women’s health; how international experience can be adapted to Ukrainian realities; and which material indicators should be considered for monitoring women’s health. The main purpose of the study is to identify social factors affecting women’s health and to develop recommendations for implementing gender-sensitive approaches into Ukraine’s healthcare system to improve women’s well-being through the integration of social and gender perspectives into health policy. The research methodology is based on a literature review, content analysis of academic works, a comparison of international and national experiences, and an interpretation of existing socio-economic indicators. The findings indicate that gender inequality, social isolation, unemployment, and unequal access to resources are key factors determining women’s health quality. The conclusions highlight the importance of integrating a gender perspective into the formulation of the country’s social and healthcare policies. Future research perspectives are linked to the need for developing tools to monitor women’s social health in Ukrainian society and adapting best practices from international experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial pedagogy theory and practiceSame topicHuman Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207