Citrus Disease Detection Based on Dilated Reparam Feature Enhancement and Shared Parameter Head
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate citrus disease identification is essential for targeted orchard pesticide application. Current models struggle with accuracy and efficiency due to diverse leaf lesion patterns and complex orchard environments. This study presents YOLOv8n-DE, an improved lightweight YOLOv8-based model for enhanced citrus disease detection. It introduces the DR module structure for effective feature enhancement and the Detect_Shared architecture for parameter efficiency. Evaluated on public and orchard-collected datasets, YOLOv8n-DE achieves 97.6% classification accuracy, 91.8% recall, and 97.3% mAP, with a 90.4% mAP for challenging diseases. Compared to the original YOLOv8, it reduces parameters by 48.17%, computational load by 59.26%, and model size by 41.94%, while significantly decreasing classification and regression errors, and false positives/negatives. YOLOv8n-DE offers outstanding performance and lightweight advantages for citrus disease detection, supporting precision agriculture development in orchards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".