MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408698371 · doi:10.1177/26334941251324951

Safety and effectiveness of office hysteroscopic metroplasty with and without uterine stent placement in infertile population: a 10-year retrospective study

2025· article· en· W4408698371 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mitko Madjunkov, Jak Ozsarfati, Ari Baratz, Karen Glass, Prati Sharma, Clifford Librach

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Advances in Reproductive Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGynecological conditions and treatments
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoCReATe Fertility Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRetrospective cohort studyHysteroscopySeptoplastyMcNemar's testSurgeryPopulationLaparoscopyObstetricsNose

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Septate uterus is a congenital uterine malformation associated with adverse reproductive and obstetrical outcomes. Hysteroscopic septum resection (HSC) with/without balloon stent placement is a treatment option for reconstituting to a normal uterine cavity; however, procedure safety and efficacy of office-based-ultrasound guided (US) HSC in patients undergoing fertility treatment is not thoroughly studied. Objectives: (1) To assess the safety and efficacy of office-based US-guided HSC septoplasty; (2) compare the safety and effectiveness of adjuvant intrauterine-balloon-Cook stent (IUBS) and (3) to evaluate the reproductive outcomes after each method. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study ( n = 90) of patients undergoing HSC at the CReATe Fertility Centre, Toronto, Canada between 2011–2022. The Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME-2018) guideline’s criteria were used for diagnosis and classification of malformation/septum size as 1—arcuate uterus <10 mm (52% (47/90)), 2—septum 10–19 mm (31% (28/90)), 3—septum 20–40 mm (7% (6/90)), and 4—complete septa (10% (9/90)). The main outcomes were the rate of procedure complications and the efficacy of septum removal. Secondary outcome measures were reproductive outcomes after septoplasty and the safety and effectiveness of adjuvant IUBS placement. T -test and chi-square test, McNemar test, and Cochran-Mantel–Haenszel test were used for stratified statistical analysis. Results: Office-HSC under US guidance was performed in 82 patients (US group) and septoplasty with laparoscopic guidance in 8 patients laparoscopy (LSC) group. IUBS placement had 34% (28/82) of patients in the US group and 12.5% (1/8) in the LSC group. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications (uterine perforations, excessive bleeding, or infections) in either group. The rate of repeated procedures, implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates (LBR) were not different when comparing septoplasty with and without IUBS. However, for patients diagnosed with septum class-2, -3, and -4, septoplasty improved their pre-treatment-LBR from 21.6% (8/37) to 77.1% (27/35) post-treatment ( p = 0.00005) and decreased pre-treatment miscarriage rate (MR) from 73% (27/37) to post-treatment 29% (7/24) ( p = 0.0007) in both groups. Conclusion: Hysteroscopic septum resection with transabdominal US guidance in the office setting is a safe and effective procedure in patients with infertility. Office hysteroscopy should be considered in the management of patients with uterine septum to improve LBR and reduce MR. The value of IUBS needs further evaluation in a larger sample-size study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Advances in Reproductive HealthSame topicGynecological conditions and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207