Intracoronary acetylcholine for vasospasm provocation in women with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To evaluate the utility of higher dose intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) during invasive coronary function testing (CFT) in women with suspected ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) for detection of epicardial vasospasm, relation to quality of life (QoL) and the presence of scar by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). CFT is an established method for diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). The utility of epicardial vasospasm provocation testing with higher dose ACh infusion is not fully understood. Women with suspected INOCA undergoing invasive CFT were enrolled in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Pre-Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (WISE Pre-HFpEF) study ( NCT03876223 ). Incremental infusions of 0.364, 36.4 μg and 108 μg ACh were used for vasospasm provocation. Vasospasm was defined as ≥75 % artery diameter reduction compared to post-nitroglycerin diameter and related to QoL and LGE on CMRI. Among 73 women (56 ± 11 years), epicardial vasospasm was detected in 17 (23 %). Among women with vasospasm, the vast majority (94 %) had coronary endothelial dysfunction and few (12 %) had other abnormal CFT measures. Those with vasospasm had more nocturnal angina symptoms, calcium channel blocker use, poorer QoL (all p = 0.001) and disease perception ( p = 0.02) than those without. LGE scar by CMRI was not associated with vasospasm ( p = 0.22). Among women with suspected INOCA, intracoronary Ach spasm testing provoked epicardial vasospasm in one fourth. Women with epicardial vasospasm overwhelmingly had concomitant endothelial dysfunction, worse QoL but not more frequent myocardial scar on CMRI. Central Illustration: Utility of acetylcholine testing in women with INOCA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".