MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408711840 · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.106

Depression vulnerability and gray matter integrity of interoceptive networks in remitted depressed outpatients

2025· article· en· W4408711840 on OpenAlexafffund
Li‐Tzy Wu, Zindel V. Segal, Norman A. S. Farb

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoThe Scarborough HospitalResearch Canada
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGray (unit)Vulnerability (computing)PsychologyDepression (economics)PsychiatryClinical psychologyMedicineComputer securityComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Interoception, the representation of internal body states, plays an important role in mental health. While functional neuroimaging links Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) relapse vulnerability to stress-induced inhibition of sensorimotor regions, its association with structural changes in interoceptive networks remains unclear. METHODS: A secondary analysis explored relationships between gray matter volume and relapse vulnerability in remitted MDD patients (N = 85), with two data acquisitions surrounding eight-weeks of prophylactic psychotherapy followed by a two-year follow-up. Participants were randomly assigned to either Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT). Mixed-effects models were applied to study the relationships between cortical thickness, time, and intervention type with clinical variables such as relapse status, residual symptoms, and decentering, adjusting for relevant covariates. Analyses were conducted at whole brain levels as well as in pre-defined regions of interest, focusing on sensory regions implicated by prior research. RESULTS: Relapse was consistently linked to greater cortical thickness in the left superior circular sulcus of the insula and the left anterior occipital sulcus. Residual symptoms correlated with increased cortical thickness in the left insula and right precentral regions, while decentering was linked to reduced thickness in the middle temporal and inferior parietal regions. MBCT participants showed greater cortical thickness increases in the right superior temporal gyrus over time. CONCLUSIONS: MDD vulnerability was unexpectedly linked to greater cortical thickness in sensory and prefrontal brain regions, suggesting that depression vulnerability may reflect maladaptive skill acquisition. MBCT may promote gray matter growth in the right superior temporal region. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT01178424.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Affective DisordersSame topicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207