MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408728766 · doi:10.23977/jeis.2025.100108

Satellite Clock Bias Prediction Method for BeiDou-3 Satellites Based on Entropy Weight Method

2025· article· en· W4408728766 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronics and Information Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Decision-Making Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSatelliteRemote sensingComputer scienceGeodesyPrecise Point PositioningEnvironmental scienceGNSS applicationsPhysicsAstronomyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to improve the accuracy and stability of satellite clock bias prediction, a combined satellite clock bias prediction method based on the entropy weight method is proposed. Firstly, the method adopts a quadratic polynomial model and a gray model to make a single prediction of satellite clock bias and generate two sets of prediction results. Then, by calculating the entropy of error information of the two sets of prediction results, it determines the weights of each model and realizes the optimal fusion of the models. Finally, the entropy weight combination method is used to obtain a higher precision prediction result. Four different types of BeiDou-3 satellites were randomly selected for the prediction test by using the precision satellite clock bias products released by the GNSS Analysis Center of Wuhan University. The results show that the method can provide high-precision short- and medium-term predictions of BeiDou-3 satellite clock bias, and its 6-h average prediction accuracy and stability are 0.22ns and 0.46ns, respectively, which are 72.15% and 48.84% higher than the average prediction accuracy of quadratic polynomial and gray models, and the stability is 70.00% and 20 .69% higher, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electronics and Information ScienceSame topicAdvanced Decision-Making TechniquesFrench-language works237,207