First Nations perspectives about youth pregnancy and parenthood in Western Sydney, Australia: A qualitative study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose Significant improvements have been made in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' (First Nations) maternal and perinatal outcomes over the past decade, such as decreasing rates of smoking and preterm birth and increasing birthweights. In Australia, higher rates of adolescent pregnancy are reported among First Nations compared with non-First Nations people. Having a baby during adolescence (youth pregnancy) increases the risk of poorer maternal and perinatal outcomes, including social outcomes such as poverty and educational attainment. This study examined First Nations peoples' perspectives about youth pregnancy and parenthood in Western Sydney, Australia. Methods Sixty-eight First Nations people aged ≥16 years living in Western Sydney, Australia were interviewed in 2019–20. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. Main findings Approximately half of the participants were aged ≥18 years. Most participants lived with family and around half were high school students. Four themes relating to youth pregnancy and parenthood were identified: 1) youth pregnancy was normalised (e.g. ‘There's always some young person in [the] community pregnant, if not several… it's celebrated as well. It's not so much of a negative thing'); 2) a desire to avoid youth pregnancy (e.g. ‘I think young people try and avoid pregnancy because they don't wanna be a teen mum'); 3) gendered experiences of youth pregnancy and parenthood (e.g. ‘I don't think a teenage boy would have like time like for a baby'); and 4) perspectives of caring responsibilities within families (e.g. ‘I feel like within Aboriginal communities, it's always seen as the oldest kid has to kind of help out the parent'). Principal conclusions Although youth parenthood was acceptable in communities, most participants wanted young people to avoid pregnancy and parenthood. There was a clear community approach to raising children, especially from the oldest children helping out with child raising.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".