Stimuli, Responses and State Dependence: Occasion Setting as a General Mechanism of Associative Control
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Associative learning is a powerful learning mechanism that encodes the predictive relationship between stimuli (and responses) and outcomes in the environment.But sometimes the same stimulus can predict different outcomes depending on the context in which it is encountered.For example, word meaning can be conceptualized as an association between an item and its verbal label.For a bilingual person a newspaper, for example, has different labels depending on the language that is being spoken-newspaper, peridico, shimbun, and so on.Occasion setting is the mechanism that allows us to select the object's name in the language we are speaking-or more generally, the appropriate association for the current context.Leising et al. highlight many procedures in which occasion setting might play a role, and attempt to identify a set of diagnostic tests to identify it, in order to promote wider use of occasion setting.In this commentary I argue that using a less empirical, more theoretical analysis might make the concept of occasion setting accessible to an even wider audience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it