MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408747098 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2025.104981

Quality of life in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD): A systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4408747098 on OpenAlexaff
G. Venkatesh Kumar, Pamela Barhoun, Ian Fuelscher, Jill G. Zwicker, Kaila M. Bianco, Mervyn Singh, Mugdha Mukherjee, Jacqueline Williams, Christian Hyde

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in Developmental Disabilities · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisPsychologyDevelopmental disorderDevelopmental psychologyQuality of life (healthcare)AutismPsychotherapistMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) often report reduced quality of life (QoL). However, substantial variability in findings across studies hinders insight into the profile of QoL in DCD. To address this, we investigated QoL in children with DCD using a meta-analytic approach, examining overall QoL, and QoL across its separate domains - physical, emotional, social, and school. Participants included 831 children with DCD ( M age = 10.10 years) and 10,283 neurotypical children ( M age = 10.04 years), i.e., controls. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for parent ( N = 8) and child ( N = 7) report data to compare overall QoL between those with and without DCD. Subgroup analyses compared QoL between groups across QoL domains. Concordance between parent and child-report was explored. Children with DCD reported significantly lower overall QoL relative to controls (SMD child = -0.38, p child <.001). This effect was consistent across domains, regardless of report-type. Parents reported significantly worse overall QoL for children with DCD than children themselves (95 % CI parent [-1.59, -0.95], 95 % CI child [-0.52, -0.24]) driven by the social (95 % CI parent [-1.89, -0.52], 95 % CI child [-0.36, -0.03]) and school domains (95 % CI parent [-2.52, -0.65], 95 % CI child [-0.53, -0.15]). Our results demonstrate the widespread impact of DCD on well-being, supporting recent arguments that DCD is more than just a disorder of movement. Discordance between parent and child perceptions highlight the importance of using both report-types when examining QoL in DCD. Our work highlights the need for more research directly comparing the profile of QoL observed in those with DCD to those with neurodevelopmental conditions (either in isolation of, or co-occurrence with, DCD). • First meta-analytical summary of research on QoL of children with DCD. • Children with DCD show poorer QoL than controls. • This effect was observed for overall QoL, and the individual QoL domains. • Reduced QoL in DCD was consistent for both child and parent-reports. • Parents report substantially worse overall QoL than children with DCD themselves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in Developmental DisabilitiesSame topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207