Two-dimensional temperature field prediction with in-situ data in metal additive manufacturing using physics-informed neural networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurately predicting the temperature field in metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes is critical for preventing overheating, adjusting process parameters, and ensuring process stability. While physics-based computational models offer precision, they are often time-consuming and unsuitable for real-time predictions. Machine learning models, on the other hand, rely heavily on high-quality datasets, which can be costly and difficult to obtain in the metal AM domain. Existing studies on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have made progress in integrating physics with machine learning but often lack in-situ data integration, which is essential for capturing real-time thermal dynamics. Additionally, their methodologies are typically heavily dependent on specific process characteristics, limiting their flexibility. Our work addresses these gaps by introducing a PINN-based framework specifically designed for temperature field prediction in metal AM. The framework incorporates in-situ temperature data gathered during the manufacturing process, combining it with physics-informed inputs and a custom loss function. The approach is demonstrated through two case studies. In the first case, using a small set of experimental data, the model achieves an error below 3 % with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 11 °C. In the second case, using simulation data, the model achieves an error below 1 % with an MAE of 7 °C. In addition, the framework shows promising adaptability for different metal AM scenarios with different geometries, deposition patterns, and process parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it